Big Ten · 3-4 · 2-2 CONF · ATS 3-4 · O/U 6-1
Purdue Boilermakers
HC Barry Odom (2nd yr) · OC Josh Henson · DC Kevin Kane
STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (3 OF 5) · BASE D 4-2-5 · SHOTGUN 100%
Power rating0.566th
CFP odds0%—
PLAYOFFOUT→OUT
Proj. wins4.8of 12
Fan pulse—12 of 30 scored
Big Ten · 3-4 · 2-2 CONF · ATS 3-4 · O/U 6-1
Purdue
Boilermakers · HC Barry Odom (2nd yr) · starts in 11 (3 of 5) · base D 4-2-5
Power rating0.566th
CFP odds · outlook0%—OUT→OUT
Proj. wins4.8of 12
Fan pulse—12 of 30 scored
Purdue
3-4 · 2-2 Big Ten
POWER RATING0.566th in FBS
CFP ODDS0%no change
PROJ. WINS4.8of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKOUT→OUT
4 losses now · CFP 0% in sims · CCG 0% · title 0%
FAN PULSE—12 of 30 scored
RECORD3-4
ATS · O/U3-4 · 6-1
POSTGAME WE · AVG51%3.6 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY+0.0165th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Indiana StateIndiana State | W44–19 | −35.5−35.5 | L | +0.71 | 52% | 20% | 94% | O 56 | — | |
EPA +0.71 · SR 52% · O 56WE 94% | |||||||||||
| 2 |   Wake ForestWake Forest | L36–38 | +2.5+2.5 | W | −0.05 | 50% | 51% | 46% | O 51.5 | — | |
EPA −0.05 · SR 50% · O 51.5WE 46% | |||||||||||
| 3 |   at UCLAat UCLA | L38–52 | +13.5+13.5 | L | −0.24 | 48% | 58% | 32% | O 53 | — | |
EPA −0.24 · SR 48% · O 53WE 32% | |||||||||||
| 4 |   Notre DameNotre Dame | L10–49 | +27.5+27.5 | L | −0.62 | 39% | 68% | 5% | O 57.5 | — | |
EPA −0.62 · SR 39% · O 57.5WE 5% | |||||||||||
| 5 |   at Illinoisat Illinois | W24–17 | +10+10 | W | +0.14 | 47% | 42% | 57% | U 62.5 | — | |
EPA +0.14 · SR 47% · U 62.5WE 57% | |||||||||||
| 6 |   MinnesotaMinnesota | W41–13 | +2.5+2.5 | W | +0.50 | 51% | 29% | 97% | O 48.5 | — | |
EPA +0.50 · SR 51% · O 48.5WE 97% | |||||||||||
| 7 |   WashingtonWashington | L26–38 | −3−3 | L | −0.34 | 34% | 53% | 30% | O 50.5 | — | |
EPA −0.34 · SR 34% · O 50.5WE 30% | |||||||||||
| 8 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 9 |   at Penn Stateat Penn StateNEXT | TBATBA | —+8.4 | — | — | — | — | 30% | — | +8.4 | |
MODEL +8.4WP 30% | |||||||||||
| 10 |   MarylandMaryland | NOV 7NOV 7 | —−6.4 | 65% | −6.4 | ||||||
MODEL −6.4WP 65% | |||||||||||
| 11 |   at Iowaat Iowa | NOV 14NOV 14 | —+10 | 27% | +10 | ||||||
MODEL +10WP 27% | |||||||||||
| 12 |   WisconsinWisconsin | NOV 21NOV 21 | —+2.4 | 44% | +2.4 | ||||||
MODEL +2.4WP 44% | |||||||||||
| 13 |   at Indianaat Indiana | NOV 28NOV 28 | —+19 | 12% | +19 | ||||||
MODEL +19WP 12% | |||||||||||