



- Spread
- UTAH −9.5
- Open −9.5
- Total
- 56.5
- Open 56.5
- Model line
- —
- Win probability
- —
- Projected score
- —
- Projected plays
- —
- FBS avg 131 · 28.9 s/play
- Spread
- UTAH −9.5
- open −9.5
- Model
- —
- Total
- 56.5
Where the model sees the game
EPA / PLAY VS FBS MEAN · OPP-ADJUSTED · GARBAGE TIME OUTEPA / PLAY VS FBS MEAN · OPP-ADJUSTED
| Unit vs defense | Offense gainsOff | Defense allowsDef | Plays | Model impactImpact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24th+0.12 | 121st+0.12 | 35 | UTAH +11.9 | |
| 12th+0.11 | 76th+0.01 | 34 | UTAH +5.8 | |
| 22nd+0.08 | 43rd−0.05 | 37 | CIN +2.0 | |
| 43rd+0.06 | 22nd−0.10 | 31 | UTAH +1.7 |
BIGGEST EDGE · UTAH +11.9
Utah's passing game vs the Cincinnati pass defense
Utah gains +0.23 EPA a play on the pass (24th); Cincinnati allows +0.23 (121st). About 34 such plays projected. OFFENSE / DEFENSE columns are EPA a play above the FBS mean; negative defense is stingier.
OFF = EPA/play gained above the FBS mean, DEF = allowed above it (negative is stingier). Impact = model points.
When Cincinnati has the ball
- +0.1435thEPA / play34th−0.01
- 43.8%50thSuccess rate22nd38.4%
- 1.3627thExplosiveness60th1.29
- +0.1522ndRush EPA / play43rd+0.02
- +0.1743rdPass EPA / dropback22nd+0.02
- 48.2%51stStandard downs SR13th43.0%
- 33.1%30thPassing downs SR60th30.4%
- 3.5520thLine yards26th2.78
- 9.2%10thHavoc rate16th17.9%
- 4.8636thPoints / opportunity28th3.40
- 86%6thRed zone TD rate29th50%
Cincinnati's offense rates higher in 6 of 11. Widest gap: standard-downs success rate (51st vs 13th).
When Utah has the ball
- +0.2215thEPA / play109th+0.14
- 48.7%11thSuccess rate103rd45.0%
- 1.3532ndExplosiveness52nd1.28
- +0.1812thRush EPA / play76th+0.08
- +0.2324thPass EPA / dropback121st+0.23
- 50.6%26thStandard downs SR93rd49.1%
- 36.6%5thPassing downs SR119th33.9%
- 3.5025thLine yards87th3.20
- 13.8%76thHavoc rate103rd12.9%
- 5.418thPoints / opportunity101st4.38
- 75%15thRed zone TD rate54th56%
Utah's offense rates higher in 11 of 11. Widest gap: passing-downs success rate (5th vs 119th).
Tempo & tendencies
SEASON TO DATE · NEUTRAL = WP 20–80%SEASON TO DATE
| Metric | FBS avgFBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Seconds per play · neutralSeconds per play · neutral | 27.7 | 29.8 | 28.9 |
| Plays per gamePlays per game | 70.0 | 64.8 | 65.7 |
| Pass rate · neutralPass rate · neutral | 57.1% | 44.6% | 47.9% |
| Pass rate over expected (PROE) · neutral, dropbacks vs xPassPass rate over expectedPROE · NEUTRAL · vs xPASS | +4.5% | −4.7% | −2.0% |
| Early-down pass rate · neutralEarly-down pass rate · neutral | 55.6% | 43.2% | 44.6% |
| 4th-down go rate · all situations4th-down go rate · all situations | 30% | 32% | 27% |
| Time of possessionTime of possession | 33:38 | 29:01 | 30:11 |
| Avg starting field positionAvg starting field position | Own 31.8 | Own 28.9 | Own 29.8 |
Neutral = WP 20–80%
All tempo →Injury report
BIG 12 AVAILABILITY · DUE ~WED · IMPACT = PTS VS REPLACEMENT × P(OUT)
Week 8 T-1 report3 OUT
Week 8 T-1 report3 OUT · 2 QUESTIONABLE · 1 PROBABLE
- OutDaMari Witherspoon · TE
- OutJosh Hough · DL
- OutNathan Nunn · DL
- QuestionableGi'Bran Payne · RB
- QuestionableDevyn Zahursky · TE
- ProbableCJ Crite · S
Line movement
| Market · consensusMarket | Open | Now | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Spread UTAH | −9.5 | −9.5 | — |
Total | 56.5 | 56.5 | — |
Moneyline UTAH | −340 | −340 | — |
Conditions & crew
KICKOFF FORECAST
- Temp
- —
- mph
- —
- Precip
- —
- Surface
- Turf

