

Big 12 · 4-2 · 1-2 CONF · ATS 3-3 · O/U 4-2
Cincinnati Bearcats
HC Scott Satterfield (4th yr) · OC — · DC Nate Woody
STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (5 OF 5) · BASE D 4-3-4 · SHOTGUN 98%
Power rating1.460th
CFP odds0%—
PLAYOFFBUBBLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins5.9of 12
Fan pulse—6 of 30 scored


Big 12 · 4-2 · 1-2 CONF · ATS 3-3 · O/U 4-2
Cincinnati
Bearcats · HC Scott Satterfield (4th yr) · starts in 11 (5 of 5) · base D 4-3-4
Power rating1.460th
CFP odds · outlook0%—BUBBLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins5.9of 12
Fan pulse—6 of 30 scored


Cincinnati
4-2 · 1-2 Big 12
POWER RATING1.460th in FBS
CFP ODDS0%no change
PROJ. WINS5.9of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKBUBBLE→LONG SHOT
2 losses now · CFP 0% in sims · CCG 0% · title 0%
FAN PULSE—6 of 30 scored
RECORD4-2
ATS · O/U3-3 · 4-2
POSTGAME WE · AVG60%3.6 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY0.0066th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W34–15 | −7−7 | W | +0.29 | 40% | 38% | 91% | U 51.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.29 · SR 40% · U 51.5WE 91% | |||||||||||
| 2 | W62–10 | −36.5−36.5 | W | +0.73 | 67% | 49% | 100% | O 61.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.73 · SR 67% · O 61.5WE 100% | |||||||||||
| 3 | W35–31 | −14.5−14.5 | L | −0.01 | 51% | 39% | 59% | O 50.5 | — | ||
EPA −0.01 · SR 51% · O 50.5WE 59% | |||||||||||
| 4 | W31–26 | +6+6 | W | +0.13 | 41% | 45% | 61% | O 55.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.13 · SR 41% · O 55.5WE 61% | |||||||||||
| 5 | L7–34 | +7+7 | L | −0.58 | 27% | 54% | 7% | U 56 | — | ||
EPA −0.58 · SR 27% · U 56WE 7% | |||||||||||
| 6 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 7 | L42–45 | +1.5+1.5 | L | +0.12 | 53% | 46% | 44% | O 64.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.12 · SR 53% · O 64.5WE 44% | |||||||||||
| 8 | SAT 12:00 FS1SAT 12:00 | +11.5+11.5 | — | — | — | — | 28% | 56.5 | +9.8 | ||
MODEL +9.8 · TOTAL 56.5WP 28% | |||||||||||
| 9 | OCT 31OCT 31 | —+10.3 | 27% | +10.3 | |||||||
MODEL +10.3WP 27% | |||||||||||
| 10 | NOV 7NOV 7 | —+13.3 | 21% | +13.3 | |||||||
MODEL +13.3WP 21% | |||||||||||
| 11 | NOV 14NOV 14 | —+3 | 43% | +3 | |||||||
MODEL +3WP 43% | |||||||||||
| 12 | NOV 21NOV 21 | —−3.7 | 59% | −3.7 | |||||||
MODEL −3.7WP 59% | |||||||||||
| 13 | NOV 28NOV 28 | —+17.5 | 14% | +17.5 | |||||||
MODEL +17.5WP 14% | |||||||||||

