Skip to content
2026 · THROUGH WK 8

SEC · 4-3 · 1-3 CONF · ATS 3-4 · O/U 2-5

Texas A&M Aggies

HC Mike Elko (3rd yr) · OC Holmon Wiggins · DC Lyle Hemphill

STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (4 OF 5) · BASE D 4-2-5 · SHOTGUN 99%

Power rating6.136th
CFP odds0%—
PLAYOFFNEEDS TITLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins6.0of 12
Fan pulse—2 of 30 scored

SEC · 4-3 · 1-3 CONF · ATS 3-4 · O/U 2-5

Texas A&M

Aggies · HC Mike Elko (3rd yr) · starts in 11 (4 of 5) · base D 4-2-5

Power rating6.136th
CFP odds · outlook0%—NEEDS TITLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins6.0of 12
Fan pulse—2 of 30 scored

Texas A&M

4-3 · 1-3 SEC

POWER RATING6.136th in FBS
CFP ODDS0%no change
PROJ. WINS6.0of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKNEEDS TITLE→LONG SHOT

3 losses now · CFP 0% in sims · CCG 0% · title 0%

FAN PULSE—2 of 30 scored

Coverage →

Latest from the beat

TEXAS A&M · LAST 72 HLAST 72 H

All coverage →

Schedule & resultsSchedule

POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS · FUTURE ROWS SHOW PREGAME WPCLOSING LINES · FUTURE ROWS SHOW PROJECTED LINEFUTURE LINES PROJECTED

Texas A&M schedule and results
Wk
Opponent
Result
Line
ATS
Net EPA
Off SR
Def SR
Win prob
Plays
s/play
1Missouri StateMissouri StateW50–0−39.5−39.5W+0.9453%17%100%8732.3
2Arizona StateArizona StateW48–20−15.5−15.5W+0.1438%36%91%5831.3
3KentuckyKentuckyL21–31−16.5−16.5L−0.3443%52%28%8423.1
4at LSUat LSUL6–35+8.5+8.5L−0.7429%49%4%5932.8
5ArkansasArkansasW34–7−14−14W+0.5147%40%95%6836.7
6at Missouriat MissouriL6–27+4.5+4.5L−0.3729%39%20%6228.7
7The CitadelThe CitadelW41–0−46.5−46.5L+0.9568%30%100%6525.7
8at Alabamaat AlabamaNEXTSAT 3:30 ABCSAT 3:30+13.5+13.5————19%132—
9BYE
10at South Carolinaat South CarolinaNOV 7NOV 7+0.5 proj+0.549%
11TennesseeTennesseeNOV 14NOV 14+3.6 proj+3.641%
12at Oklahomaat OklahomaNOV 21NOV 21+1.2 proj+1.247%
13TexasTexasNOV 27NOV 27+3.2 proj+3.242%

Success rate by down & distance

1st86%n 750%n 839%n 14850%n 4
2nd53%n 1751%n 3741%n 5820%n 15
3rd71%n 2842%n 1929%n 2414%n 14
4th67%n 9100%n 20%n 117%n 6

Formation & personnelFormation

PBP TAGS · 394 OF 397 PLAYS394 OF 397 PLAYS TAGGED

Formation splits
LookLook · usage
Usage
Pass %Pass
EPA/playEPA
SR
Shotgun99%99%51%+0.0243%
Under center1%1%20%−0.7720%
No-huddle91%91%53%0.0042%
Huddle9%9%30%+0.0843%
StartersSTARTERS
114 of 5 games101 of 5BASE D4-2-55 of 5
114 of 54-2-5base D · 5 of 5

In shotgun on 99 % of tagged snaps, passing 51 % of the time (+0.02 EPA a play; −0.77 under center). No-huddle on 91 %. Starts in 11 personnel in 4 of 5 games. Base defense 4-2-5 (5 of 5).

Next game

SAT 3:30 ABC · BRYANT-DENNY STADIUMSAT 3:30 ABC

at AlabamaLINE+13.5MODEL+14.7WP19%

TOP INJURY · OFFICIAL REPORT

O
Terry BusseyWR · JR
WR · top injury
NEXT UPA. Bethel-RomanΔ −0.27 EPA/play
0%TO PLAY
−1.9IMPACT PTS

% to play = 1 − P(out) · expected return not reported

LINE · MODEL · WPIMPACT −1.9 PTS

Refs

JUDGMENT FLAGS OVER EXPECTED · 2026FLAGS OVER EXPECTED / G · 2026

Judgment flags over expected by crew conference
Crews from
FOE / G
90% range
Games
Read
SEC crews−0.4 to +0.6 · 24 games+0.1−0.4 to +0.624NOISE
ACC crews— · 1 game+0.1—1NOISE
Big 12 crews— · 1 game−3.3—1NOISE
Big Ten crews— · 1 game−1.2—1NOISE
Sun Belt crews— · 1 game−2.8—1NOISE
FRIENDLIEST CREWFRIENDLIESTJames Carter−1.8 / g · 3 games · noise−1.8 / g · 3 g · noise
TOUGHEST CREWTOUGHESTMatt Loeffler+1.3 / g · 4 games · noise+1.3 / g · 4 g · noise

+ = more judgment flags on Texas A&M than expected · 2026 only: crews known for 7 of 8 games · no lean before 8 gamesJudgment flags only, 2026 · crews known for 7 of 8 games · + = more on Texas A&M than expected · no lean before 8 games

Key players

Unit statsEfficiency

OPP-ADJUSTED · RANK OF 138 FBSFBS RANK · OPP-ADJUSTED

Texas A&M offense statistics
MetricStat
Texas A&MTAMU
RankRK
FBS avgVS FBS
EPA / play+0.0191st+0.06
Success rate41.6%72nd42.3%
Explosiveness1.23115th1.30
Rush EPA / play+0.0679th+0.07
Pass EPA / play+0.02112th+0.11
Passing downs SR30.5%82nd31.1%
Line yards3.1975th3.21
Sack rate allowed5.5%84th5.3%
3rd-down conversion44%49th41%
Points / opportunity4.7743rd4.27
Red zone TD rate72%31st63%
Seconds / play29.190th28.0