

Big Ten · #9 AP · 6-0 · 4-0 CONF · ATS 6-0 · O/U 3-3
UCLA Bruins
HC Bob Chesney (1st yr) · OC Dean Kennedy · DC Colin Hitschler
STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (3 OF 4) · BASE D 3-3-5 · SHOTGUN 100%
Power rating11.118th
CFP odds61%—
PLAYOFFLOCK→BUBBLE
Proj. wins10.5of 12
Fan pulse—4 of 30 scored


Big Ten · #9 AP · 6-0 · 4-0 CONF · ATS 6-0 · O/U 3-3
UCLA
Bruins · HC Bob Chesney (1st yr) · starts in 11 (3 of 4) · base D 3-3-5
Power rating11.118th
CFP odds · outlook61%—LOCK→BUBBLE
Proj. wins10.5of 12
Fan pulse—4 of 30 scored


UCLA
#9 · 6-0 · 4-0 Big Ten
POWER RATING11.118th in FBS
CFP ODDS61%no change
PROJ. WINS10.5of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKLOCK→BUBBLE
0 losses now · CFP 61% in sims · CCG 52% · title 16%
FAN PULSE—4 of 30 scored
RECORD6-0
ATS · O/U6-0 · 3-3
POSTGAME WE · AVG79%4.7 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY+0.2710th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W45–24 | −2.5−2.5 | W | +0.51 | 58% | 33% | 88% | O 53.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.51 · SR 58% · O 53.5WE 88% | |||||||||||
| 2 | W28–10 | −13.5−13.5 | W | +0.55 | 45% | 31% | 91% | U 53.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.55 · SR 45% · U 53.5WE 91% | |||||||||||
| 3 | W52–38 | −13.5−13.5 | W | +0.24 | 58% | 48% | 68% | O 53 | — | ||
EPA +0.24 · SR 58% · O 53WE 68% | |||||||||||
| 4 | W54–3 | −2.5−2.5 | W | +0.71 | 38% | 27% | 99% | O 56 | — | ||
EPA +0.71 · SR 38% · O 56WE 99% | |||||||||||
| 5 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 6 | W17–15 | +10+10 | W | +0.20 | 34% | 28% | 48% | U 57.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.20 · SR 34% · U 57.5WE 48% | |||||||||||
| 7 | W17–7 | −1.5−1.5 | W | +0.11 | 41% | 40% | 77% | U 42.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.11 · SR 41% · U 42.5WE 77% | |||||||||||
| 8 | SAT 3:30 CBSSAT 3:30 | −15−15 | — | — | — | — | 84% | 44 | −16.3 | ||
MODEL −16.3 · TOTAL 44WP 84% | |||||||||||
| 9 | OCT 31OCT 31 | —−21 | 90% | −21 | |||||||
MODEL −21WP 90% | |||||||||||
| 10 | NOV 7NOV 7 | —−12.5 | 78% | −12.5 | |||||||
MODEL −12.5WP 78% | |||||||||||
| 11 | NOV 13NOV 13 | —−15.1 | 82% | −15.1 | |||||||
MODEL −15.1WP 82% | |||||||||||
| 12 | NOV 21NOV 21 | —−2.5 | 56% | −2.5 | |||||||
MODEL −2.5WP 56% | |||||||||||
| 13 | NOV 28NOV 28 | —−4.2 | 60% | −4.2 | |||||||
MODEL −4.2WP 60% | |||||||||||

