

MAC · 4-3 · 2-1 CONF · ATS 4-3 · O/U 5-2
Miami (OH) RedHawks
HC Chuck Martin (13th yr) · OC Gus Ragland · DC Bill Brechin
STARTS IN 10 PERSONNEL (3 OF 6) · BASE D 3-4-4 · SHOTGUN 99%
Power rating−3.591st
CFP odds0%—
PLAYOFFNEEDS TITLE→OUT
Proj. wins6.8of 12
Fan pulse—1 of 30 scored


MAC · 4-3 · 2-1 CONF · ATS 4-3 · O/U 5-2
Miami (OH)
RedHawks · HC Chuck Martin (13th yr) · starts in 10 (3 of 6) · base D 3-4-4
Power rating−3.591st
CFP odds · outlook0%—NEEDS TITLE→OUT
Proj. wins6.8of 12
Fan pulse—1 of 30 scored


Miami (OH)
4-3 · 2-1 MAC
POWER RATING−3.591st in FBS
CFP ODDS0%no change
PROJ. WINS6.8of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKNEEDS TITLE→OUT
3 losses now · CFP 0% in sims · CCG 20% · title 9%
FAN PULSE—1 of 30 scored
RECORD4-3
ATS · O/U4-3 · 5-2
POSTGAME WE · AVG54%3.8 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY−0.0585th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L14–59 | +16.5+16.5 | L | −0.58 | 29% | 49% | 1% | O 47.5 | — | ||
EPA −0.58 · SR 29% · O 47.5WE 1% | |||||||||||
| 2 | W45–7 | −30.5−30.5 | W | +1.44 | 79% | 26% | 100% | O 47 | — | ||
EPA +1.44 · SR 79% · O 47WE 100% | |||||||||||
| 3 | L31–35 | +14.5+14.5 | W | +0.01 | 39% | 51% | 41% | O 50.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.01 · SR 39% · O 50.5WE 41% | |||||||||||
| 4 | W24–21 | −2.5−2.5 | W | +0.08 | 42% | 38% | 61% | U 52.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.08 · SR 42% · U 52.5WE 61% | |||||||||||
| 5 | L20–24 | −11.5−11.5 | L | −0.24 | 37% | 50% | 41% | O 42.5 | — | ||
EPA −0.24 · SR 37% · O 42.5WE 41% | |||||||||||
| 6 | W20–19 | −6−6 | L | −0.01 | 34% | 37% | 50% | U 44.5 | — | ||
EPA −0.01 · SR 34% · U 44.5WE 50% | |||||||||||
| 7 | W34–14 | −9.5−9.5 | W | +0.35 | 41% | 34% | 86% | O 47.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.35 · SR 41% · O 47.5WE 86% | |||||||||||
| 8 | SAT 1:00 ESPN+SAT 1:00 | −3.5−3.5 | — | — | — | — | 58% | 40 | −3.3 | ||
MODEL −3.3 · TOTAL 40WP 58% | |||||||||||
| 9 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 10 | NOV 3NOV 3 | —−10.2 | 73% | −10.2 | |||||||
MODEL −10.2WP 73% | |||||||||||
| 11 | NOV 10NOV 10 | —−1.3 | 53% | −1.3 | |||||||
MODEL −1.3WP 53% | |||||||||||
| 12 | NOV 17NOV 17 | —−6 | 64% | −6 | |||||||
MODEL −6WP 64% | |||||||||||
| 13 | NOV 24NOV 24 | —+5.3 | 38% | +5.3 | |||||||
MODEL +5.3WP 38% | |||||||||||

