

Big Ten · 4-2 · 1-2 CONF · ATS 2-4 · O/U 1-5
Michigan Wolverines
HC Kyle Whittingham (1st yr) · OC Jason Beck · DC Jay Hill
STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (3 OF 4) · BASE D 4-2-5 · SHOTGUN 96%
Power rating6.037th
CFP odds0%—
PLAYOFFBUBBLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins6.7of 12
Fan pulse−9▲6


Big Ten · 4-2 · 1-2 CONF · ATS 2-4 · O/U 1-5
Michigan
Wolverines · HC Kyle Whittingham (1st yr) · starts in 11 (3 of 4) · base D 4-2-5
Power rating6.037th
CFP odds · outlook0%—BUBBLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins6.7of 12
Fan pulse−9▲6


Michigan
4-2 · 1-2 Big Ten
POWER RATING6.037th in FBS
CFP ODDS0%no change
PROJ. WINS6.7of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKBUBBLE→LONG SHOT
2 losses now · CFP 0% in sims · CCG 0% · title 0%
FAN PULSE−9▲6
20 pts below the model ·Coverage →
RECORD4-2
ATS · O/U2-4 · 1-5
POSTGAME WE · AVG61%3.7 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY+0.1036th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W13–12 | −27.5−27.5 | L | +0.23 | 43% | 33% | 52% | U 50 | — | ||
EPA +0.23 · SR 43% · U 50WE 52% | |||||||||||
| 2 | W17–10 | +5+5 | W | +0.19 | 28% | 34% | 70% | U 43.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.19 · SR 28% · U 43.5WE 70% | |||||||||||
| 3 | W52–17 | −34.5−34.5 | W | +0.69 | 57% | 28% | 98% | O 48.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.69 · SR 57% · O 48.5WE 98% | |||||||||||
| 4 | L19–20 | −5−5 | L | +0.06 | 46% | 29% | 51% | U 40 | — | ||
EPA +0.06 · SR 46% · U 40WE 51% | |||||||||||
| 5 | L14–20 | −6.5−6.5 | L | 0.00 | 37% | 40% | 36% | U 42.5 | — | ||
EPA 0.00 · SR 37% · U 42.5WE 36% | |||||||||||
| 6 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 7 | W21–18 | −6−6 | L | +0.22 | 40% | 40% | 59% | U 43.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.22 · SR 40% · U 43.5WE 59% | |||||||||||
| 8 | SAT 12:00 FOXSAT 12:00 | +7.5+7.5 | — | — | — | — | 33% | 42.5 | +7.5 | ||
MODEL +7.5 · TOTAL 42.5WP 33% | |||||||||||
| 9 | OCT 31OCT 31 | —−8.4 | 69% | −8.4 | |||||||
MODEL −8.4WP 69% | |||||||||||
| 10 | NOV 7NOV 7 | —−10.4 | 74% | −10.4 | |||||||
MODEL −10.4WP 74% | |||||||||||
| 11 | NOV 14NOV 14 | —+7.9 | 32% | +7.9 | |||||||
MODEL +7.9WP 32% | |||||||||||
| 12 | NOV 21NOV 21 | —+2.5 | 44% | +2.5 | |||||||
MODEL +2.5WP 44% | |||||||||||
| 13 | NOV 28NOV 28 | —+17.6 | 14% | +17.6 | |||||||
MODEL +17.6WP 14% | |||||||||||

