

MAC · 5-2 · 3-0 CONF · ATS 3-3 · O/U 4-3
Ohio Bobcats
HC John Hauser (1st yr) · OC Scott Isphording · DC Kurt Mattix
STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (4 OF 6) · BASE D 4-2-5 · SHOTGUN 100%
Power rating−2.385th
CFP odds0%—
PLAYOFFNEEDS TITLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins8.3of 12
Fan pulse—2 of 30 scored


MAC · 5-2 · 3-0 CONF · ATS 3-3 · O/U 4-3
Ohio
Bobcats · HC John Hauser (1st yr) · starts in 11 (4 of 6) · base D 4-2-5
Power rating−2.385th
CFP odds · outlook0%—NEEDS TITLE→LONG SHOT
Proj. wins8.3of 12
Fan pulse—2 of 30 scored


Ohio
5-2 · 3-0 MAC
POWER RATING−2.385th in FBS
CFP ODDS0%no change
PROJ. WINS8.3of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKNEEDS TITLE→LONG SHOT
2 losses now · CFP 0% in sims · CCG 51% · title 24%
FAN PULSE—2 of 30 scored
RECORD5-2
ATS · O/U3-3 · 4-3
POSTGAME WE · AVG58%4.1 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY−0.0787th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L21–49 | +24+24 | L | −0.62 | 34% | 51% | 2% | O 47 | — | ||
EPA −0.62 · SR 34% · O 47WE 2% | |||||||||||
| 2 | W29–27 | −2−2 | P | −0.14 | 42% | 46% | 42% | O 49.5 | — | ||
EPA −0.14 · SR 42% · O 49.5WE 42% | |||||||||||
| 3 | L36–41 | +7+7 | W | −0.24 | 47% | 44% | 27% | O 50 | — | ||
EPA −0.24 · SR 47% · O 50WE 27% | |||||||||||
| 4 | W35–7 | −32.5−32.5 | L | +0.70 | 54% | 17% | 96% | U 53.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.70 · SR 54% · U 53.5WE 96% | |||||||||||
| 5 | W13–10 | −3.5−3.5 | L | −0.16 | 44% | 41% | 58% | U 51 | — | ||
EPA −0.16 · SR 44% · U 51WE 58% | |||||||||||
| 6 | W31–14 | −2.5−2.5 | W | +0.83 | 65% | 36% | 83% | U 45.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.83 · SR 65% · U 45.5WE 83% | |||||||||||
| 7 | W48–7 | −17.5−17.5 | W | +0.91 | 56% | 24% | 100% | O 46.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.91 · SR 56% · O 46.5WE 100% | |||||||||||
| 8 | SAT 4:00 ESPNUSAT 4:00 | −10−10 | — | — | — | — | 83% | 48.5 | −15.6 | ||
MODEL −15.6 · TOTAL 48.5WP 83% | |||||||||||
| 9 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 10 | NOV 3NOV 3 | —−11.5 | 76% | −11.5 | |||||||
MODEL −11.5WP 76% | |||||||||||
| 11 | NOV 10NOV 10 | —+1.3 | 47% | +1.3 | |||||||
MODEL +1.3WP 47% | |||||||||||
| 12 | NOV 17NOV 17 | —−13 | 78% | −13 | |||||||
MODEL −13WP 78% | |||||||||||
| 13 | NOV 27NOV 27 | —+2.5 | 44% | +2.5 | |||||||
MODEL +2.5WP 44% | |||||||||||

