

Big Ten · #6 AP · 6-1 · 3-1 CONF · ATS 1-6 · O/U 3-4
Indiana Hoosiers
HC Curt Cignetti (3rd yr) · OC Mike Shanahan · DC Bryant Haines
STARTS IN 11 PERSONNEL (4 OF 5) · BASE D 4-2-5 · SHOTGUN 99%
Power rating16.77th
CFP odds75%−1
PLAYOFFIN→LIKELY
Proj. wins9.9of 12
Fan pulse—22 of 30 scored


Big Ten · #6 AP · 6-1 · 3-1 CONF · ATS 1-6 · O/U 3-4
Indiana
Hoosiers · HC Curt Cignetti (3rd yr) · starts in 11 (4 of 5) · base D 4-2-5
Power rating16.77th
CFP odds · outlook75%−1IN→LIKELY
Proj. wins9.9of 12
Fan pulse—22 of 30 scored


Indiana
#6 · 6-1 · 3-1 Big Ten
POWER RATING16.77th in FBS
CFP ODDS75%−1 this week
PROJ. WINS9.9of 12 games
PLAYOFF OUTLOOKIN→LIKELY
1 loss now · CFP 75% in sims · CCG 35% · title 17%
FAN PULSE—22 of 30 scored
RECORD6-1
ATS · O/U1-6 · 3-4
POSTGAME WE · AVG79%5.6 expected wins
NET EPA / PLAY+0.279th FBS
Schedule & resultsSchedule
POSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS) · FUTURE ROWS: PREGAME WP + MODEL LINEPOSTGAME WE = HOW OFTEN THIS BOX SCORE WINS (10K SIMS)POSTGAME WE · 10K SIMS
Wk | Opponent | Result | Line | ATS | Net EPA | Off SR | Def SR | WP · post / pre | O/U | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W52–16 | −40−40 | L | +0.44 | 50% | 38% | 100% | O 57 | — | ||
EPA +0.44 · SR 50% · O 57WE 100% | |||||||||||
| 2 | W55–0 | −57.5−57.5 | L | +1.34 | 59% | 20% | 100% | U 67.5 | — | ||
EPA +1.34 · SR 59% · U 67.5WE 100% | |||||||||||
| 3 | W38–0 | −45−45 | L | +0.69 | 47% | 31% | 99% | U 59.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.69 · SR 47% · U 59.5WE 99% | |||||||||||
| 4 | W29–23 | −20.5−20.5 | L | −0.14 | 50% | 43% | 63% | O 50 | — | ||
EPA −0.14 · SR 50% · O 50WE 63% | |||||||||||
| 5 | W47–15 | −24.5−24.5 | W | +0.97 | 56% | 32% | 99% | O 57 | — | ||
EPA +0.97 · SR 56% · O 57WE 99% | |||||||||||
| 6 | W20–17 | −9.5−9.5 | L | +0.09 | 32% | 41% | 57% | U 48.5 | — | ||
EPA +0.09 · SR 32% · U 48.5WE 57% | |||||||||||
| 7 | L15–19 | +3+3 | L | −0.06 | 35% | 38% | 38% | U 49.5 | — | ||
EPA −0.06 · SR 35% · U 49.5WE 38% | |||||||||||
| 8 | SAT 12:00 FOXSAT 12:00 | −7.5−7.5 | — | — | — | — | 67% | 42.5 | −7.5 | ||
MODEL −7.5 · TOTAL 42.5WP 67% | |||||||||||
| 9 | OCT 31OCT 31 | —−22.2 | 91% | −22.2 | |||||||
MODEL −22.2WP 91% | |||||||||||
| 10 | BYE | ||||||||||
| 11 | NOV 14NOV 14 | —−9.9 | 73% | −9.9 | |||||||
MODEL −9.9WP 73% | |||||||||||
| 12 | NOV 21NOV 21 | —−11.9 | 76% | −11.9 | |||||||
MODEL −11.9WP 76% | |||||||||||
| 13 | NOV 28NOV 28 | —−19.1 | 88% | −19.1 | |||||||
MODEL −19.1WP 88% | |||||||||||

